<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An FDIC study of US retail banking:  no room for growth?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practicalstockinvesting.com/2009/12/04/us-retail-banking-no-room-for-growth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practicalstockinvesting.com/2009/12/04/us-retail-banking-no-room-for-growth/</link>
	<description>Helping the Owl of Minerva to catch an earlier flight</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:39:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Geddes</title>
		<link>http://practicalstockinvesting.com/2009/12/04/us-retail-banking-no-room-for-growth/#comment-1272</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Geddes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicalstockinvesting.com/?p=1454#comment-1272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I supported the plan to let Wal-Mart supply banking services when that idea surfaced a few years ago but I&#039;m guessing that there are at least two reasons Congress rejected this sensible plan then and would probably do so again now.  

First, the banking lobby in Washington is huge compared to Wal-Mart&#039;s lobby and banks are equal-opportunity givers: the Democrats and Republicans both get heaps of money shoveled at them to stifle real competition in the banking industry; second, although Democrats would have been the &quot;natural&quot; party to support a measure that would surely benefit lower-income citizens, the Democrats have an instinctive hatred of Wal-Mart because it&#039;s non-union.  

Thus, greed and ideology once again conspire to deny a real benefit to those at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder.  I&#039;m just sayin&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I supported the plan to let Wal-Mart supply banking services when that idea surfaced a few years ago but I&#8217;m guessing that there are at least two reasons Congress rejected this sensible plan then and would probably do so again now.  </p>
<p>First, the banking lobby in Washington is huge compared to Wal-Mart&#8217;s lobby and banks are equal-opportunity givers: the Democrats and Republicans both get heaps of money shoveled at them to stifle real competition in the banking industry; second, although Democrats would have been the &#8220;natural&#8221; party to support a measure that would surely benefit lower-income citizens, the Democrats have an instinctive hatred of Wal-Mart because it&#8217;s non-union.  </p>
<p>Thus, greed and ideology once again conspire to deny a real benefit to those at the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder.  I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

