Archive for the 'emerging markets' Category

BASF: a chemical company’s view of 2010

Chemicals–not a fan

I’m not a big fan of chemical companies’ stocks.  This is partly because it’s a value investor’s industry, partly that I don’t know chemicals well enough.

My perception, though, is that it’s a hard industry to survive in, one dogged by chronic overcapacity.  Every ten years or so, chastened managements halt new capital investments for long enough to allow world demand to grow into existing capacity.  A boom follows for maybe two years.  But then somebody somewhere–be it China or the Middle East or someplace else, or a developed world player with unfamiliarly large cash balances burning a hole in his pocket–commissions enough new plant and equipment to create another decade’s overcapacity.  And the bust part of the cycle begins anew.

But I am interested in what BASF is saying

I like BASF.  True, I’m not sure I’d want to own the stock, even with the current dividend yield of close to 4%.  But the company has very savvy management.  It’s just in a tough industry to make money in.

I listened to the BASF yearend conference call over the weekend.  My purpose–to get the company’s view of what operating conditions would be like in 2010.  This is what I found out: Continue reading ‘BASF: a chemical company’s view of 2010′

Stock markets in developing countries (IV): what you can do to add value

The easiest and safest way to invest in emerging markets is to buy a broad index fund or ETF that covers these markets.  But if you are willing to do some work, there are four things I think you can do to to focus your money on potentially higher return areas.  All contain some risk and require that you not simply buy and forget but continue to monitor your investment regularly.   You may also find yourself limited by your broker’s ability to transact in certain areas (can you buy, and, more important, if you change your mind, can you get out).

The four are:

1.  focus on healthy countries. Stable, foreigner-friendly, government is the first requirement (leaving out places like Venezuela).  Ideally, the government budget should be balanced, or close to it.   The stock of government debt, as a percentage of GDP, should not be rising rapidly.  The country should generate enough foreign exchange through exports to comfortably cover its foreign debt service.  Imports should be mostly machinery or other items to help build up the country’s industrial base–not consumer items like TVs.  (By the way, on these criteria, except for stable government, the US and the UK would flunk the emerging markets investment test.)

2.  use the export-oriented manufacturing development model. Successful developing countries have, by and large, grown by encouraging technology transfer in support of export-oriented manufacturing.  This means the country invites foreign firms to set up manufacturing bases within the country, so the local workforce can develop their skills.  To do this, the country must offer electric power, communication, fresh water, a road network and ports.  In developing countries, these are all growth industries.

3.  reach in to the developing country indirectly, through a company in a developed market that has, say, a third of its operations in the developing world.  Many western European companies, especially in consumer staples, have subsidiaries in Eastern Europe, for example.  Most former colonial powers have trading companies or telecom firms that still operate in their former colonies.  In addition to the mainland firms listed in Hong Kong, that market also has many property and trading firms with large China exposure.

The advantage to doing this is that you get Western management, whose motivations you can easily understand, plus developing market growth potential.  One thing to watch for, though–old colonial masters may not be A-listers in a former colony.  The old Hong Kong opium firms still controlled by non-Chinese are an example.

find an active manager who has a consistent record of beating the index in a given area. The Matthews China Fund comes to mind as an example.  either on a discount broker website, Morningstar, or the fund group’s website, you can see the historical record.  Make sure the same people who achieved the record are still around, though.

Macau gaming, January 2010–a chance to see two different investment universes

Yesterday morning, a European news agency reported that overall gaming revenue in Macau was up 63% year on year and 24% month on month.  This result was far ahead of market expectations.

In the US market, WYNN was up 5.9% and LVS rose 10.4% in an overall market that was up 1.4%

In the Hong Kong market overnight, the market reaction there to the same information was that 1128 (Wynn Macau) gained 2.3% and 1928 (Sands China) 4.0%, while the Hang Seng index, up .14%, barely moved. Continue reading ‘Macau gaming, January 2010–a chance to see two different investment universes’

Stock markets in developing countries (lll): “invisible” issues

Every market has issues that are often well understood by local investors but not to foreigners.  China found this out a few years ago when a government-related company bid for Unocal, a US oil and gas company whose Pacific Basin reserves it found attractive.  The same for Dubai, when it bought a UK company that held US port operations.  In both cases, Washington vetoed the transactions.

The US isn’t alone in this practice.  Foreigners will find it hard to buy companies in Continental Europe–even EU members may be unable to make acquisitions in neighboring countries.   And Japan has enacted laws over the past ten years that make foreign takeovers all but impossible–as if the informal barriers already in place weren’t enough.

Stock markets in developing countries have these issues, too–but they also have others that are orders of magnitude greater.  They include: Continue reading ‘Stock markets in developing countries (lll): “invisible” issues’

Stock markets in developing countries (ll): basic questions

Anyone who wants to actively select individual country funds or individual stocks in the markets of less developed nations has to consider a number of basic issues, the answers to which investors in developed markets take for granted.  These include:

political stability, or the lay of the land. In most developed countries, politics makes for interesting discussion, but ultimately is not a crucial element in investment success.

Russia, in contrast, jumps out to me as a country where reading the political runes is more important than analyzing the assets or profit growth potential of any particular company and where the government’s attitude to foreign investors can change overnight.  But there are lots of other examples, as well, like: Continue reading ‘Stock markets in developing countries (ll): basic questions’

Next Page »


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Subscribe to my RSS feed–Click on line 3

SiteMeter

practicalinvest