Shaping a portfolio for 2012 (II): Europe

Europe–I’m not an expert…

I’ve been watching European stock markets for over 25 years, but I don’t consider myself an expert on Europe.  There are too many social and political quirks for me to get motivated to master its intricacies, given the relatively small size of each country, and of continental Europe in the aggregate, in stock market terms.  So I’ve taken an “American” approach and tried to just pick stocks.

…but everyone has to have a plan

On the other hand,  most stock market investors have to have a plan for dealing with Europe, since it’s a big trading partner with China and maybe a quarter of the revenues of the S&P 500 come from Europe.

Even a simple plan is almost infinitely better than nothing.  It gives you a baseline to monitor for signs that the reasoning behind your stock selection is wrong.  Rather than simply watch your stocks go down in flames, you can try to fix the budding problem.

Here’s my take on Europe:

There are a number of political groupings in Europe.  The widest is the EU itself.  Then there’s the Eurozone (all the countries which have adopted the common currency, the €) as a subset of the EU.  And there are other things like the Schengen free travel area.

For investors, the Eurozone is the most important of these.

To my mind, the defining characteristic of the Eurozone is that it has a common monetary policy, but fiscal policy that’s determined by each country.  This is what has the EZ in trouble today.

The ECB sets interest rates at a level that’s appropriate for the EZ as a whole.  For traditionally slower growing countries at the core, like France and Germany, that has arguably been too restrictive.  For faster growing, smaller economies on the periphery of the EZ, the rate has been extremely stimulative.

Easy money sloshing around the periphery found its way into massive numbers of speculative real estate deals.  Of course, each country should have recognized this and restrained speculation through cautious fiscal policy.  But what politician is going to take the punch bowl away from the party?  After all, there’s always an election around the corner.

To some degree, real estate speculation also infected the periphery with the “Dutch disease,” meaning that demand for construction workers drove up wages elsewhere–making other, export-oriented manufacturing industries less competitive.  For Americans, it’s like Detroit and the car industry.

If that weren’t bad enough, two countries, Greece and Italy, decided to game the system.

In my experience, Italy has always been the least economically responsible large country in Europe.  Yes, it took heroic measures to restructure itself to qualify to enter the EZ as a charter member.  But then it fell back into its old slovenly ways.

I’ll confess that I know next to nothing about Greece.  My impression is that it thinks membership in the EZ was a fabulous chance to scam the rest of Europe.  My impression is that it will happily default on its sovereign debt and leave the EU as soon as it gets a chance–sort of like skipping out on a restaurant check.  Luckily, its small size makes it a rounding error for Europe as a whole.

That’s the problem.  But where are we now?

I think we’re past the worst and on the way to fixing the current EZ problems.  I don’t mean the structural flaws in the EZ, but just today’s crisis.

We’re already seeing serious reform out of Ireland and Spain.  Greece and Portugal (another country where I have no clue) are too small to matter.   The real EZ economic uncertainty comes down to what happens in Italy.

Italy went through another painful wholesale economic reform process to enter the EZ and it has appointed economist Mario Monti as premier with a mandate for reform.  I think these are good signs that Italy is wiling to make the necessary changes to its economy once again.

One other point to mention:  a much simpler fix to problems in Italy and Greece would be to have the ECB loosen money policy by, for example, buying up Italian government bonds.  Doing so removes any incentive for Italy to reform, however–so it just kicks the can down the road.  More than that, money policy that’s inappropriately loose for Germany creates the need to use restrictive fiscal policy to offset it.  Angela Merkel certainly doesn’t want to have to do that.

my bottom line

economics

Politicians in any area of the world only seem to me to act when the situation has deteriorated so far that the painful measures they need to implement are greeted with relief by the electorate as a “rescue” from a worse fate.

I think we’re at, or past, that point in the EZ and that the essential measures are already agreed to, through changes in government, that will end the current EZ crisis.

The main means of change will be austerity.  Once the ECB is convinced that Italy is sincere in its reform efforts it may provide some monetary assistance.  But cutting government spending and enforcing tax laws will be the order of the day.

For the European periphery, this spells recession today and low growth for a while after.

stock markets

The bigger question for equity investors is often not so much what the economic reality is likely to be as, rather, what economic scenario is currently being discounted in today’s stock prices.

I have four conclusions:

1.  I think today’s European stock prices discount a more pessimistic outcome than I see as probable.

2. I don’t think that attitude will change, however, until we see changes in EZ laws that are slated for March plus further concrete developments from Rome.

3.  I don’t want to bet the farm on my analysis.

4.  No matter what the precise outcome, Europe is likely to be the slowest growing area of the world in 2012.

Therefore,

I’m substantially underweight Europe.   I hold small positions in a couple of equity mutual funds, and one stock, through its ADR, IHG.  I would prefer Europe-listed companies that have most of their business in other parts of the world over primarily domestic-oriented firms.  I’d also prefer to reach into Europe through multi-nationals listed elsewhere that have some European exposure.

Shaping a portfolio for 2012 (I): general

I’m going to write my beginning of the year strategy thoughts in five or six installments over the next week. I’ll post on what I think is going on economically in Europe, China and the US; what I feel is currently discounted–and what isn’t–in today’s stock prices; how I see the markets evolving over the year; and how I’m positioning my portfolio.

Before I’ve written everything out (I usually think things through by writing), I suspect my bottom line will be that we’ll remain in a trading range for now, with short periods of investor enthusiasm alternating with periods of real fear.  I also expect the crucial issue will not be the way economic events will play out, but rather when investors will shift from discounting the same old (and bad) news again and again (typical down market behavior) to anticipating the possibility of good news in the future.  I think that the next major move is up.

globalization

Today I want to mention one dynamic–globalization–that I think will be an enduring issue over the next several years.  A week or so ago, I saw a commentary that’s part of the Financial Times’ A-List series (which is, as far as I can see, a hodge-podge of writers ranging from the exceptionally talented to the functional equivalent of Paris Hilton or Donald Trump).  It’s titled “The downward slide continues–the great revolt will come later,” and was written by Mark Malloch-Brown, a former UN official.   It’s short and well worth reading.  The part I found interesting was paragraphs 2 and 3.

It’s not that I think that Mr. Malloch-Brown has hit the nail on the head.  I don’t.   The situation is much more complex than his simplistic portrayal would have you believe.   I don’t think the world is going to hell in a handbasket from here, either.  And the emerging world vs. developed isn’t exactly new news. After all, the first Toyotas reached US shores almost 40 years ago.  It is true, though, that pace of change accelerated once mainland China decided the capitalist road was worth walking along (around 1980) and SAP et al developed supply chain software capable of monitoring global businesses (mid-1990s).

What I like about Mr. Malloch-Brown is that he doesn’t mince words.  There’s something important to the idea that governments like Greece, Italy, or to some extent the rest of the developed world, wittingly or not (I’m in the not camp), have maxed out their credit cards spending borrowed money to protect the local economic status quo, and to dampen the negative effects of pretending increasing competition from emerging economies doesn’t exist. The bill for that has come due.

It’s tempting to riff on the intellectual poverty of politics in the US.  I won’t–other than to say that there’s some small chance of a positive surprise if enough citizens demand change.

Whether that happens or not, I think that dedication to trying to preserve the status quo, which is what led Japan to into its two “lost decades” (so far) can be a useful litmus test for investors to separate countries into winners and losers and control their portfolio exposure accordingly.

There’s another important consequence of the idea that governments in the developed world no longer have the money to try to roll back the tides of change.  It’s that economic change may well happen at an accelerating rate over the next several years.

For investors, I think this means we should own agents or beneficiaries of change.  That’s already been the ticket to success since the turn of the century.  It may be even more so in the coming decade.

A quiz:  Rank the following stocks in order of their performance (on a capital changes basis–I’m lazy) over the past ten years:

Amazon

Apple

Berkshire Hathaway

Cisco

Kellogg

Intel

Microsoft

Oracle

Procter & Gamble

Wal-Mart.

Answer below↓

Apple     +3378%

Amazon     +1348%

Kellogg          +72%

P & G          +70%

Oracle          +67%

Berkshire          +56%

S&P 500     +8%

Wal-Mart          +4%

Cisco          -10%

Microsoft          -21%

Intel          -31%.

Huge gains for innovators, losses for companies that have gone ex-growth, struggles for firms that don’t globalize.  I think the next decade will bring more of the same.