how high is “high” for the S&P 500 now?

One of the most reliable aspects of human behavior is that we all extrapolate from recent prior experience.  We form rules that are at first provisionary, but which gain strength as new experience seems to validate them.

This is the psychological basis for one of the few really powerful axioms of technical analysis, support and resistance.

The idea is that people buy financial assets at prices that in the past have proved profitable entry points and sell at prices that have shown themselves to be relatively high.  Put in more negative, but still psychologically valid, terms, I think, people who have previously sold at low points and bought at highs rue their decisions and reverse them if given another chance.   This provides, as it were, a built-in clientele of buyers at previous lows and sellers at prior highs.

How do we apply this insight to today’s S&P?

Simple.

The S&P 500 peaked at:

—2110 on February 20, 2015

—2108 on March 20, 2015

—2130 on May 25, 2015

—2124 on June 23, 2015

—2128 on July 20, 2015

—2102 on August 17, 2015

—2110 on November 15, 2015

—2102 on December 1, 2015, and

—2078 on December 29, 2015.

 

We closed yesterday at 1986.  Fundamentals aside, about 5% – 6% higher than that we run into a wall of people who have been trained that 2100 or so is a time to sell.

Such resistance levels aren’t insurmountable obstacles.  Breaking through them, and therefore beginning a new buy/sell training regime, would be a hugely positive sign.  But the large number of recent instances when 2100-2130 has proved a market high water mark argues that this is a formidable barrier to advance.

Economic Innovation Group: Distressed Communities Index

Last week, the Economic Innovation Group, a think tank backed by tech entrepreneurs, released a study on inequality in the US–something I learned about from a feature in the New York Times.

The most important conclusions of the study, as I see them:

–50 million  Americans, about a sixth of the total population, live in “distressed” zip codes

–in the distressed areas, 55% of the adults are not working and median income is 2/3 of the median level for that state.  27% of residents live in poverty.  25% of adults have less than a high school education.

–from 2010 through 2013, a period of strong recovery from recession, distressed areas lost 6.7% of their jobs; 8%+ of businesses there closed.

–distress in concentrated in a small number of areas that are suffering from long-term structural problems.  They are primarily in the South, the Southwest and the Rust Belt.  The recession didn’t cause the economic woes of these areas, but it certainly greased the downward-pointing skids.

Texas has 5.2 million people in distressed zip codes, the most of any state, and 20% of the population.  40% of the population of Mississippi lives in distressed zip codes, the largest percentage of any state.

–just as distress is concentrated in small enclaves, so too is prosperity.  The median zip code showed just a 2.3% annual increase in income, or less that half the 5.6% national average.  The median zip showed zero growth in businesses.

In contrast, in the top 20% of zip codes, jobs grew by 17.4% and businesses by almost 9%.

–sharp differences in economic health often exist side by side.  Well-off cities like New York or San Francisco exhibit little economic difference from zip code to zip code.  In contrast, in the most “spatially unequal” cities, as the report puts it, namely San Antonio, Phoenix and Columbus, “nearly adjacent neighborhoods live worlds apart.”

My point in all this?

This is a counterpoint to the glowing comments from Warren Buffett in his most recent letter to shareholders.  Yes, residents of distressed zip codes who can are voting  with their feet and leaving for more favorable climes–often in different neighborhoods in the same city.  As a result of such movement, one might take a very long view and argue that the economic issue dissipates with time.  But although the current plight of 50 million may not be so visible from Nebraska, their situation may turn out to be a social and political issue of some consequence in the meantime.  Very likely, it already is.