Roll-up is the name commonly used to describe the process of buying up and merging small participants in a highly fragmented industry.
The acquirer is most often a financial buyer, typically a private equity firm, rather than the operating management of a company in the industry in question.
The companies acquired are typically relatively small–and of sub-optimal size, in economic terms.
They are most often privately held, and owned by individuals who don’t have a sophisticated awareness of the value of their firms–either as stand-alone entities or as part of a larger combination. As a result, purchase prices can be small single-digit multiples of yearly sales.
Industries in the US that have been rolled-up include: radio stations, auto dealerships, funeral homes, independent radio and TV stations, billboards, taxi walkie-talkie radio systems (i.e., Nextel).
why do this?
The two basic aims of a roll-up are to achieve large size relative to other competitors in the industry, and to grow to economically optimal size in absolute terms. Doing so allows the roll-up to:
–lower administrative overheads,
–cut capital spending by sharing plant and equipment,
–negotiate lower prices and/or better payment terms with suppliers,
–offer a wider array of services to customers,
–create and market a brand name–with the increase in unit profits that this will bring,
–have units mutually support each others’ sales efforts,
–focus competitive activity at firms outside the roll-up.
I’ve already mentioned that:
–the target companies can usually be bought very cheaply, and
–economies of scale and simple improvements in general management can boost profitability a lot.
–better access to credit can reduce borrowing costs,
–the target firms can be more highly leveraged financially (= more debt) as part of a larger unit, and
–the rolled-up company will likely be IPOed, allowing the private equity company to cash out at least several times its purchase price.
why an IPO?
Two reasons, other than extra profits …one good reason, one bad:
–the private equity company is likely funding the roll-up with money from institutions or high net worth individuals. These investors will expect their capital + profits to be returned after, say, five years.
—firms that carry out roll-ups typically have little hands-on experience running businesses, and not much detailed knowledge of the rolled-up industry. They’re good at basic general management and at creating a capital structure with a lot of debt in it to boost returns on equity. I think they realize they’re better off exiting the roll-up before some crucial issue arises that requires industry knowledge to solve.