Pershing no longer owns any JCP
Bill Ackman has followed up his departure from the board of JCP by describing his investment in that company as a “failure” and striking a deal with Citigroup (C) to sell his entire 38.08 million share holding (about 18% of the outstanding stock).
Ackman’s investment group will receive $12.90 a share, less fees. My guess is that they’ll net about $12.25. We’ll know for sure when the final prospectus comes out.
Contrary to earlier press reports, which said C was going to take this massive position onto its own trading books and gradually dribble the stock out to the market (which would have entailed a huge risk) this is a straightforward underwriting. The only twist is that there’s no big underwriting/sales group. C is the sole underwriter.
The underwriting process goes like this:
–Pershing Square asks C to lead an offering to sell its JCP stock
–C assembles the underwriting/sales group, in this case itself
–C calls clients to get indications of interest and to try out possible prices.
–C sets a price (in this case $12.90 a share), distributes a preliminary prospectus, gets firm commitments from clients and buys the stock from Pershing Square. This last apparently occurred yesterday.
Technically speaking, client commitments aren’t legally binding. Unless you’re very big and powerful, however, there’s a fat chance you’ll ever get to see a good IPO allocation again if you go back on your word
–C sells the stock to clients. This is presumably happening this morning.
As part of the deal, C gives buyers a final prospectus, which– legally speaking, is the only official offering document. The client has a brief time to review it and return the stock if he doesn’t like what he reads. In my experience, however, clients seldom read the final prospectus. I don’t know anyone who’s ever returned stock.
what bothers me
I’m usually a solidly free markets guy. Laissez faire and all that. But Pershing-JCP is a case of corporate bungling on an epic scale.
Ackman enters in cape and tights to “save” a company that’s not a world beater but nevertheless is muddling along. He installs similarly-clad Ron Johnson as CEO. Johnson promptly alienates customers, loses a third of company sales and burns up a ton of corporate cash. All the while he’s defended by Ackman. Both exit the now-smoking wreckage with a few tepid words of apology.
Yes, both lost money and their reputations are tarnished a bit …but that doesn’t seem to me to be enough. On the other hand, I’m not sure what other penalties there should be. Disbarment?
Maybe it’s just the speed at which disaster struck that disturbs me. As I think about it, I can come up with many examples of the same incompetence in slower-moving corporate train wrecks. Think: C. Michael Armstrong at ATT, and then Citigroup (as a board member). How about Carly Fiorina…or just about any CEO…at Hewlett-Packard?
one other note: It’s interesting that C was able to find buyers for 18% of the stock at $12.90. A floor on the stock price?