my take on tablets
I like gadgets.
I’ve had my eye on a tablet since I first saw one in a university bookstore (a MSFT product) almost a decade ago. But that one was very clunky and didn’t let you do much more than highlight Word documents. I looked at a Lenovo combination laptop/tablet a few years later, but it was very underpowered. And there was still no infrastructure of applications to justify the tablet part.
Now there’s the iPad. It’s the usual well-designed AAPL consumer device. But to me it has seemed little more than another device to lug around that’s not much more than an expensive e-reader and an extremely costly way to play Angry Birds.
my newspaper problems
Then the Financial Times newspaper stopped coming to the house.
Yes, I still read the physical newspaper.
–the FT (comprehensive global business news; a UK perspective on US/world economic and political developments),
–the NY Times (reasonable, US-oriented business news, good–though weakening–sports coverage) and
–the Wall Street Journal (good sports, lots of gossip in the NY section, almost no useful business coverage–meaning I won’t renew).
why the physical paper
I’m not a fan of wood products per se. But I’ve thought the physical paper has several advantages over the web version:
–the amount of news in the physical paper is greater than on the front page of the newspaper website. So the editors’ selection of what’s most important is a greater influence on what you see online than in the physical paper. As a result, the chances of finding information whose significance is not adequately understood is greater in the physical paper.
–I think the web presentation is organized to highlight stories that will maximize visits. In contrast, the physical paper is organized to deliver information.
–I thought (not any longer) that it’s easier to reconstruct with the physical paper a timeline of information flow by reading back editions you might not have gotten on the day of publication than it is to go back a day or two in time on the website.
my call to the FT
When I called the FT last Saturday to get replacement copies of the papers that didn’t come, the representative I talked to mentioned the e-paper that’s available through ftnewspaper.com.
The site is run with software from Olive Software, a private company in Aurora, Colorado. ftnewspaper.com has daily back editions. You can turn the pages of each edition, just like an online catalog. You can pop out to larger size and different formats the articles you want to read in depth. I also discovered that, through FT email alerts, I had already read most of “today’s” paper online yesterday!
ftnewspaper.com has been around for a couple of years. I just didn’t know about it.
Anyway, I can cancel my physical paper subscription and save a couple of hundred dollars a year. No more worries about cancelling delivery when we may be travelling. No more toting around piles of unread orange newsprint. Less recycling to do.
All of that just means that I can rationalize paying for a tablet with the money I’ll save by stopping a newsprint subscription. But I’ve also found a sophisticated and valuable application, other than email, that’s completely suited to what a tablet can do and that I use every day. This means that I have a positive reason to buy one.
I’d like to see the new Google tablets, as well as iPad 3, before I take the plunge. I have only one concern.
In my career on Wall Street, I’ve observed the long struggle for control of brokerage houses between researchers and traders that has been decisively won by the latter. I’ve thought of this as somewhat like the age-old high school contest between jocks/cool people and the nerds.
It seems to me that the same battle is going on in newspaper firms between traditional reporters and online search engine optimizers–the latter being more interested in eyeballs than in information. As I study successful financial websites with an eye to improving this blog, I can see the same dynamic in play in this arena–well-crafted and very popular websites with lots of advertising, but almost no useful investment information.
By shifting my financial support from the reportorial nerds to the online jocks, I’m most likely speeding the day when even the FT will suffer from a content deficiency. But that’s a problem for another day.