Recently Beijing announced it wants to take equity positions in the major internet companies in China and place Communist Party officials on their boards of directors.
What’s going on?
I see two general possibilities.
Some background first.
Deng’s economic reform
In the late 1970s, Deng Xiaoping realized that the Chinese economy was too big to be controlled through central planning. To grow it had to adopt Western economic (but not political) methods. So he began to allow the market, not doctrinally-correct political cadres, to dictate the direction of expansion.
A major issue he faced in doing so was that, say, three-quarters of Chinese industry was owned by the state. These companies were rudderless, and hopelessly inefficient–but they employed tons of people. If large numbers lost their jobs all at once, the ensuing social instability might threaten the rule of the Party. Therefore, economic progress had to be tempered by the need to avoid this outcome. And this in a nation without sophisticated macroeconomic tools to control the pace of growth.
The result over three+ decades has been a Chinese economy that lurches between boom and bust, depending on the temperature in the state-owned enterprises. The strategy has generally been successful, I think, with the state-owned sector now representing less than a third of China’s overall output.
–China’s internet companies have become large enough that their actions, intentional or not, can accelerate the speed at which state-owned companies shrink. So they need to be monitored much more carefully than in the past. This is the benign interpretation, and the one which share prices suggest the market has adopted
–China’s internet companies have become large enough to generate “creative destruction” in large enough amounts to threaten the economic control over China exercised by the Communist Party itself. If this is the case, then the oversight over domestic internet conglomerates will be much more draconian than the consensus expects. That would presumably result in considerable PE contraction for the firms being controlled.
My guess is that the first possibility is much more likely to be the case. But I think we should watch the situation closely for new hints about Beijing’s intentions.