There seems to me to be increasing questioning recently among professional economists about whether the Fed’s official inflation target of 2% is a good thing or whether the target should be changed to, say, 3%.
The 2% number has been a canon of academic thought in macroeconomics for a long time. But the practical issue has become whether 2% inflation and zero are meaningfully different. Critics of 2% point out that governments around the world haven’t been able to stabilize inflation at that level. Rather, inflation seems to want to dive either to zero or into the minus column once it gets down that low, with all the macro problems that entails. It’s also proving exceptionally hard to get the needle moving in the upward direction from t sub-2% starting point. My sense is that the 3% view is gaining significant momentum because of current central bank struggles.
This is not the totally wonkish topic it sounds like at first. A 2% inflation target or 3% actually makes a lot of difference for us as stock market investors:
–If the target is 3%, Fed interest rate hikes will happen more slowly than Wall Street is now expecting.
–At the same time, the end point for normalization of rates–having cash instruments provide at least protection from inflation–is 100 basis points higher, which would be another minus for bonds (other than inflation-adjusted ones) during the normalization process.
–Over long periods of time, stocks have tended to deliver annual returns of inflation + 6%. If inflation is 2%, nominal returns are 8% yearly; at 3% inflation, returns are 9%. In the first case, your money doubles in 9 years, in the second, 8 years. This doesn’t sound like much, either, although over three decades the higher rate of compounding produces a third more nominal dollars.
Yes, the real returns are the same.
But the point is that the pain of holding fixed income instruments that have negative real yields is greater with even modestly higher inflation than with lower. So in a 3% inflation world, investors will likely be more prone to favor equities over bonds than in a 2% one.
–Inflation is a rise in prices in general. In a 3% world, there’s more room for differentiation between winners and losers. That’s good for you and me as stock pickers.