DIS’s 4Q12: more earnings progress, but a stock price fall

I’m still using my phone as an internet connection.  

Still no word from Comcast about when service will be restored.   But I’ve seen my bill.  No adjustment for half a month without service!  This behavior contrasts so sharply with that of every other company I’ve seen that I’ve got to believe there’ll be a lot of negative fallout when people realize what Comcast is doing.

DIS’s 4Q12

After the close last Thursday, DIS reported 4Q12 and full fiscal-year 2012 results.  The company earned $.68 per share during the three months ending September 29th, up 15% year on year, on revenues of $10.8 billion, up 3% yoy.  For the twelve months of fiscal 2012, DIS posted eps of $3.07 on revenues of $42.8 billion.  Earnings were up 21% yoy, on a revenue gain of 3%.

The stock dropped about 7% on the report.

Yes, 4Q12 eps growth was less than the rate of gain earlier in the year.  And, yes, Wall Street never likes such deceleration.  But I don’t think that was the main reason for the decline in DIS shares.  Rather, during its conference call management told analysts that 1Q13 eps will probably be no better than flat with 1Q12.  After that, comparisons will likely pick up   …but DIS didn’t say by how much.  The lack of guidance isn’t unusual.  It’s the way DIS operates, and it’s fine with me.  But in this instance, the uncertainty (temporary, I think) about fiscal 2013 eps growth caused the selloff in the aftermarket and on Friday.

On Friday, I rebought much of the stock I had sold a while ago at around $40 a share.

Why?

I’ve come to think that I’ve underestimated the growth that can come from the non-ESPN side of the business–the Disney side, meaning the theme parks, movie studios and consumer products divisions that together produce about a third of today’s total DIS operating profits.  I especially like the acquisition of Lucasfilm.

Also, I think the weak 1Q13 is more a function of accounting quirks than fundamental weakness. Specifically:

a flat 1Q13

The factors behind this are:

Hurricane Sandy, although DIS says the superstorm hasn’t prevented any Jerseyites from getting to Disneyworld so far.  But certainly some stores and movie theaters were closed during the storm.  And some customers hurt by Sandy will have less discretionary income for a while.

Whatever the effect, it’s likely to be small, negative and transitory.

ESPN.  The sports giant has signed major new contracts for sports content.  It will take a while for ESPN to pass higher programming costs on to customers.  Also, while the presidential election season is great for advertising in general, it’s not so good for ESPN.

Disneyworld.  The Florida theme park is undergoing its first major overhaul in 40 years.  The parks are also in the middle of making a big upgrade to their computer systems.  Much of these costs are being recognized as expenses right now, rather than being stored up on the balance sheet and being shown as reductions in income over the life of the assets.  What DIS is doing is more conservative, which I approve of.  But that won’t change the fact that eps won’t look as good as they otherwise would.

the week as the major accounting unit of time.  Readers of my prior DIS posts will be familiar with this issue.  Most companies keep their accounts on a month-by-month basis.  Hotels and retailers–and DIS–typically keep theirs on a week-by-week basis, which they believe gives them better control over operations.

The four 13-week units the latter companies use don’t match up exactly with the calendar year.  For DIS, this means that the bulk of the lucrative New Year holiday–and the $30 million in operating income this entails–will end up being in 2Q this fiscal year vs. 1Q last.

movies  1Q12 benefitted from Cars 2 and the rerelease of Lion King.  There’s nothing comparable in the hopper for 1Q13, so DIS estimates a falloff of $150 million in operating income.

Except for the Studio Entertainment segment, all these are timing, or accounting presentation, issues rather than economic ones.  And in the case of movies, no one can manufacture hits each quarter, so this is just a function of the way the business operates–and why it gets a lower earnings multiple than more predictable ones.

my take

I think the recent selloff is a mistake.  My guess is that fiscal 2013 eps will come in at about $3.50, assuming Washington doesn’t drive us over the fiscal cliff.  To my mind, that prospect justifies a price in the low to mid $50 range.  But comparisons will likely be accelerating into fiscal 2014, creating the possibility of multiple expansion from the 15x I’m assuming.  Not necessarily a rocketship ride, but still probably meaningful market outperformance.

AAPL’s eye-popping 3Q11

the results

AAPL reported earnings for its fiscal 3Q11 (the company’s fiscal year ends in September) after the close of trading in New York yesterday.  Sales came in at an all-time high for the company at $28.6 billion.  That’s up 82% over 3Q10.  Net income of $7.3 billion ($7.79 a share) was another company record and represents 125% more than in the comparable period of last year.  Analysts had been expecting eps of $5.85.

the details

All the company’s product categories showed interesting deviations from what one might have expected:

iPad  …the biggest positive surprise.  iPad was over 20% of AAPL’s revenue in the quarter, in which the company sold 9,246,000 of them.  Sales were up 97% quarter on quarter in units and 113% in revenue.  Year on year, units were up 183% and revenue 179%.  The iPad continues to be capacity constrained, meaning AAPL is selling them as fast as it can make them and still can’t satisfy demand.  With manufacturing capacity added in early July, the company appears to be close to supply-demand balance, however.  My hunch is that there’ll be a strong seasonal uptick in the December quarter as consumers buy holiday gifts.  If so, we may see shortages again in a few months.

iPhone  …another big number.  The company sold 20,338,000 in the June period.  That’s up 9% in units and 8% in revenues qoq, and +183% in units, 179% in revenue, yoy.  A continuing surge in smartphone sales, combined with the fall from grace of both NOK and RIMM, are the main reasons.

Mac   Overall sales were up 5% in units qoq and 14% yoy.  Portables, however, were up only 1% qoq and 13% yoy.  One reason is the strength in the prior-year quarter, which saw a new MacBook Pro introduced.  Another, however, is that some customers are buying iPads instead of Macs.

iPod  …sales dropped sharply.  This shows how far APPL has evolved in the past half decade.  The product that sparked AAPL’s revival and effectively doubled the size of the company now represents less than 5% of current total revenue.  Management said the 7,535,000 units AAPL sold in the quarter exceed its expectations.  But qoq units were down 16% and revenue down 17%;  year on year, units were down 20% and revenue minus 14%.

what caught my eye/ear

1.  The company conference call seemed to me to be almost devoid of content.  Maybe it’s always been this way and the fact just hasn’t struck me so forcefully.

2.  Analysts did ask two interesting questions, both of which the company evaded.

–The first concerned the relative strength of Android-based phones, which appear to be growing faster than iPhones.

–The second was about whether the iPad is cannibalizing Mac sales to a greater degree than it’s cannibalizing Windows-based machine sales.

The non-answers suggest two things to me.  First, the ability of Android phones to cover a wide spectrum of price points, vs. AAPL only at the high end, is a bigger competitive issue for AAPL than the consensus thinks.  Second, while it’s always better to cannibalize your own sales than to allow a competitor to do so, it sounds like more potential Mac buyers than AAPL expected (maybe MacBook Air buyers) are “trading down” to an iPad instead.

3.  Look at the difference between analysts’ estimates and AAPL’s actual reported eps for fiscal 2011 to date.

1Q:   $5.40 estimate, $6.43 actual

2Q:  $5.37 estimate, $6.40 actual

3Q:  $5.85 estimate, $7.79 actual

Actuals were 19%, 19% and 33% above what analysts had projected.

Two points:  analysts have been pretty awful–and unusually so–at projecting AAPL’s earnings this year.  Also, despite the big positive earnings surprises, huge earnings growth, and a price earnings multiple in the mid-teens, AAPL has been no better than a market performer in 2011, until a couple of weeks ago (more about this phenomenon in a day or two).

the stock

The numbers continue to be stellar and the PE is low, so I think AAPL will continue to be at least a mild market outperformer.  For the first time in many years, however, I don’t feel that I can pencil in an aggressive earnings growth number for the upcoming fiscal year and be confident the actuals will be at least what I’ve estimated…and probably substantially more.  In fact, if you told me you thought AAPL’s eps would only be up by 15% in fiscal 2012, I’d have to do a bunch of spreadsheet work before I could express an opinion.  (Note, too, that AAPL is making a minor accounting change that will depress near-term results slightly.)

That shouldn’t be so surprising, since the stock (I haven’t owned it for some time) is up 30x since I first bought it, and is now one of the largest-cap stocks on Wall Street.  Could this maturing of AAPL’s business be what Wall Street has been discounting for a while now?  In conceptual terms, probably.  Myself, I think the inflection point for growth is a new thing–but it’s possible I’ve just been behind the curve.