…toss in Wynn Macau (HK: 1128), as well.
Chow Tai Fook
Chow Tai Fook is a Hong Kong-based jeweler that IPOed there last December. The company’s main business is chuk kam (24 karat) gold objects, the stuff that’s sold by weight, not market up by 100% (or more) over direct costs. It’s not only decoration, but you can bury it in the back yard if you’re wary of banks. And you can wear your wealth to work, in case you find out you have to flee the country right away. (You wouldn’t chuckle if you’d lived through 1940-1960s China.)
The firm has expanded from the SAR into the mainland, and from chuk nam to high-end “fine” jewelry designed to flaunt your wealth, not hide/preserve it. In recent years, the latter has become an increasing percentage of Chinese jewelry consumption.
a December 2011 IPO
The IPO was anything but a rousing success. The stock was priced at HK$15, to raise US$ 2 billion. But it came to market just as Beijing’s efforts to slow down the domestic economy were causing affluent mainlanders to cut back consumption.
The issue closed on day one at $13.80–and headed south from there. It finally bottomed some months ago at HK$8.40. Ouch!!
…so, what’s curious?
Here’s the thing.
The economic evidence over the past few months is that China is slowing further, despite signals from Beijing of its change to a more expansive government economic policy.
The EU is a mess.
US industry is slowing down and the “fiscal cliff” is getting closer. Burberry and Tiffany have revised down earnings, in large part because of disappointing sales in China. So too have tech companies like Intel.
since July 27th,
Chow Tai Fook share are up by 26.5%–vs. the Hang Seng index up 6.9%
BTW, Wynn Macau shares are up by 30.0% over the same time span
TIF began rising a little earlier in the month, but has gained almost 25% from its low–compared with about an 8% rise in the S&P 500.
why this good performance?
It’s a little like the case of Benjamin Button, whose body went through the opposite of what nature usually does.
–If this were ten or fifteen years ago, I’d say investors are seeing through current weakness and beginning to discount in advance the recovery that the government policy change will likely bring.
But reacting to government cues is not the winning strategy it once was. That’s partly because the economic problems the world faces today are more structural than cyclical. Also, the rise of hedge funds has reoriented markets sharply in the direction of short-term trading than they have ever been.
Besides, luxury goods makers like Hermes and LVMH haven’t experienced the same stock price lifts.
–new bets on China? But, if so, why no response from Hermes, LVMH or Coach? Also, why would UK-US (lower-end) jeweler Signet be having better stock performance than the other three?
–influence of EU investors? My impression has been that a lot of the damage to Hong Kong stocks during the middle months of 2012 was due to panicky selling by EU-based investors. The clear new bullishness emanating from Europe may be resulting in portfolio managers plowing back into Asia. That might explain why 1929 or 1128 are doing well. But why TIF? …or why SIG and not LVMH?
–minimizing exposure to the EU? For aesthetic reasons, I like this better than “bets on China,” because it’s a more sophisticated wager–one based on avoiding a bad experience rather than necessarily having a good one. Still, why TIF?
You could build a “synthetic” TIF-ex-the-EU, by combining SIG +1929. Not a perfect replacement, but if the main idea is to avoid the EU probably an acceptable one.
I’m sure there’s a method to the apparent madness. At this point, however, I don’t know what it is.
I could say that professional investors are shifting their portfolios toward secular growth areas (as opposed to more cyclical ones) where they see profit growth will be the strongest next year. Yes, that’s true, but it’s what most managers always do. So it’s flirting with tautology. The crucial question is why jewelry and casino gambling?
Is there something special about these two areas? …or is there something awful about everything else?
One thing I am convinced of is that solving the puzzle correctly can bring investing rewards.
I own 1128 and 1929 but none of the rest of the names I’ve mentioned here. I have no burning desire to add to any–although if I can figure out what’s going on I might develop one.
If someone were forcing me to buy one of the names, it would probably be 1929. The fact that it’s the most speculative of the stocks is not a coincidence. I should knock off the caffeine instead.