I’ve just updated my Keeping Score page for a surprisingly strong (to me, anyway) July. Sector rotation is the main message.
As far as US stock are concerned, I don’t know.
As/when the correction is over, however, it’s very important to look for signs of a leadership change. At a minimum, one former hot industry/sector typically grows ice cold; at least one former laggard heats up. Figuring this out and tweaking/reorienting your portfolio can make a big difference in this year’s returns.
prices equity investors watch
Investors who are not oil specialists typically use (at most) two crude oil prices as benchmarks:
—Brent, a light crude from under the North Sea. Today it is selling at just about $70 a barrel. “Light” means just what it says. Brent is rich in smaller, less-heavy molecules that are easily turned into high-value products like gasoline, diesel or jet fuel. It contains few large, denser molecules that require specialized refinery equipment to be turned into anything except low-value boiler fuel or asphalt. Because it can be used in older refinery equipment that’s still hanging around in bunches in the EU, it typically trades at a premium
—West Texas intermediate, which is somewhat heavier and produced, as the name suggests, onshore in the US. It is going for just under $64 a barrel this morning.
What’s remarkable about this is that we’re currently nearing the yearly low point for crude oil demand. The driving season–April through September–is long since over. And for crude bought, say three weeks from now, it’s not clear it can be refined into heating oil and delivered to retail customers before the winter heating season is over.
Yet WTI is up from its 2017 low of $45 a barrel last July and from $57 a barrel in early December. The corresponding figures for Brent are $45 and $65. (Note that there was no premium for Brent in July. I really don’t know why–some combination of traders’ despair and weak end user demand in Europe.)
why the current price strength?
Several factors, most important first:
–OPEC oil producers continue to restrain output to create a floor under the price
–they’re being successful at their objective, as the gradual reduction of up-to-the-eyeballs world inventories–and the current price, of course–show
–the $US is weakening somewhat.
My Lighting class is calling, so I’ll finish this tomorrow. The bottom line for me, though: I think relative strength in oil exploration and production companies will continue.
I’ve just updated my Keeping Score page for September, 3Q17 and year-to-date. IT continues its remarkable run. Utilities et al continue to falter.
Yesterday may have marked an inflection point in the US stock market. Today’s potential follow through, if it happens, will give us a better idea.
Domestically, Mr. Trump appears to be moving on from pressing his social program to tax reform–and, maybe, infrastructure spending, both of which are issues of potentially great positive economic significance. At the same time, results of the first round of the French presidential election (which pollsters got right, for once) seem to suggest the threat that France might leave the euro, thereby reducing the fabric of the EU to tatters, is diminishing.
yesterday’s S&P 500
How did Wall Street react to this news? The sector breakout of yesterday’s returns, according to Google Finance, are as follows:
S&P 500 +1.1%
Consumer discretionary +0.7%
Staples led the pack, presumably because this sector has the greatest exposure to Europe–and a rising euro. Financials advanced significantly also, on the idea that stronger economic growth will lead to rising interest rates, a situation that benefits banks.
Industrials and Materials perked up as well. Again, these are sectors that benefit from accelerating economic growth.
Energy marches to the beat of its own drummer. The rest are consistent with the story behind the winning sectors, either defensives or beneficiaries of moderate (that is, not rip-roaring) economic performance.
My guess is that this pattern may continue for a while yet. Personally, I’m most comfortable participating through Financials and IT.
As I’m writing this just after 8am est, the French stock market is up by about 5%, large-cap European issues are up 4%, the euro is up by 1%+ against the US$, and stock index futures show US stocks opening up about 1%.
This is all because yesterday’s first round of the French presidential election ended up pretty much as the polls had predicted. Candidates with 5%+ of the vote, in their order of finish, are:
Le Pen 21.4%
Fillon, an experienced politician and candidate of the center-left, had been the early favorite, but was undone by a scandal involving no-show government jobs for family members that paid, in total, more than €1 million. Fillon’s subsequent refusal to withdraw directly undermined the prospects for Macron, the centrist candidate, and gave life as well to Mélenchon, of the far left.
The market fear had been that, with the center/left vote split three ways, Marine Le Pen, the far right choice, might end up doing surprisingly well. That worry was intensified by the Brexit vote, the Trump victory and a terrorist incident in France last week.
The stakes in this election are very high. Le Pen’s key economic platform: leave the euro and repudiate French euro-denominated debt. The euro would be replaced by a new franc, which would be rapidly devalued–à la Abenomics in Japan–in order to give the economy a short-term boost. Repaying euro-denominated French government debt with francs would “solve” the problem of French national debt, but at the cost of destroying the country’s ability to borrow internationally in the future (think: Argentina). Were the Le Pen agenda to be implemented, it’s not clear to me how the EU could survive.
The consensus view now is that the Fillon and Mélenchon votes will gravitate to Macron, giving him a large victory in the second round of the election, between Macron and Le Pen, on May 7th (and earlier version of this post had the incorrect date). Let’s hope so.
We now have whole week until the potential US government shutdown over funding for the Trump-envisioned border wall with Mexico.
How good is the UK, the part of the EU most American investors know best, as a way to participate in potential economic strength in Europe over the coming 12 months?
Probably not good at all. Here’s why:
–since the Brexit vote last June, sterling has depreciated by 13+% against the US dollar and 8+% against the euro. While the loss of national wealth in Japan through depreciation dwarfs what has happened in the UK, the blow to holders of sterling-based assets is still immense.
Depreciation lowers the UK standard of living and reduces the purchasing power of residents by raising the cost of imported goods. While one might argue that the fall in sterling is in the past–and while the consumer will be in trouble benefits to export-oriented firms through lower costs are still to come–this may not be the case here. More in point #3.
–there’s some evidence that UK residents, realizing last June that prices would soon begin to rise, did a lot of extra consuming before/while firms were marking up their wares. If so, the UK economy could be in for a significant slowdown over the coming months, both because consumers are now poorer and because they’ve already used up a chunk of their budgets through anticipatory buying.
–much of the appeal of the UK as a destination for export-oriented manufacturing comes from its position as the large foreigner-friendly country in the EU, from which multinationals could reach into the rest of the union. That’s no longer the case. An article from yesterday’s Financial Times is titled ” Brussels starts to freeze Britain out of EU contracts.” Its basis is an EU government memo, which, as the FT reads it, advises staff to:
–avoid considering the UK for any new business dealings where contracts may extend beyond the two year deadline for Brexit
–cancel existing contracts with UK parties that extend beyond the Brexit deadline
–urge UK-based companies to relocate to continental Europe, presumably if they want favorable consideration for new business.
It seems to me that the EU leaked this memo to the FT to get the widest possible dissemination of its new not-so-friendly-to-the-UK policies. It implies that the post-Brexit business slowdown in the UK will start immediately, not in two years.
One set of potential winners: UK-based multinationals that do little or no business with the EU. These, like ARM Holdings, are also potential takeover targets–although it’s questionable if the UK will permit further acquisitions by foreigners.